5th Annual Lecture March 18 , 2010 5pm Hoffman Hall |
George E. Smith Fellow of IEEE, APS, and member of the National Academy of Engineering. IEEE Electron Devices Society Distinguished Service Award, Stuart Ballentine Medal of the Franklin Institute (1973); Morris N. Liebmann Memorial Award of IEEE (1974); Progress Medal of the Photographic Society of America (1986); IEEE Device Research Conference Breakthrough Award (1999); Edwin H. Land Medal by the Society for Imaging Science and Technology (2001); and the C&C Prize (Computer and Communications) of the NEC Foundation, Tokyo (1999), Charles Stark Draper Prize (2006) Winner of the 2009 Nobel Prize in Physics
The invention and early history of the Charge-Coupled Device (CCD)
|
4th Annual Lecture May 8 , 2009 |
Sidney Altman Sterling Professor of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology Professor of Chemistry, Biophysical Chemistry & Organic Chemistry Yale University Winner of the 1989 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
From physics to molecular biology
My travels from a nascent physicist to a student of molecular biology will be described in some detail. What I did in molecular biology and how my training in physics played a role will also be summarized.
|
3rd Annual Lecture April 18, 2008 |
Douglas Osheroff Department of Physics Stanford University Winner of the 1996 Nobel Prize in Physics
How Advances in Science are Made
How advances in science are made and how they may come to benefit mankind at large are complex issues. The discoveries that most influence the way we think about nature seldom can be anticipated and the same often can be said for new inventions and technologies. One thing is most clear: seldom are such advances made by individuals alone. Rather, they result from the progress of the scientific community-asking questions, developing new technologies to answer those questions, and sharing their results and their ideas with others. However, there are research strategies that can substantially increase the probability of one's making a discovery. Dr. Osheroff will illustrate some of these strategies in the context of a number of well known discoveries, including the work he did as a graduate student, for which he shared the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1996.
|
2nd Annual Lecture May 11, 2007
|
Brian Schmidt Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics Australian National University
The Universe from Beginning to End
To explain our observations of the Cosmos, Astronomers believe the Universe began in a Big Bang, and is expanding around us. How Big and Old is the Universe? What is in the Universe, and how will it End? Brian Schmidt will describe the Universe which we live in, and how astronomers have used exploding stars, known as supernovae, to track the expansion of the Universe back some 10 Billion years and to answer some of these and other fundamental questions about our Universe.
|
1st Annual Lecture April 7, 2006
|
Leo Kadanoff Departments of Physics and Mathematics University of Chicago President-Elect of the Americal Physical Society
Making a Splash; Breaking a Neck: The Development of Complexity in Physical Systems
The fundamental laws of physics are very simple. They can be written on the top half of an ordinary piece of paper. The world about us is very complex. Whole libraries hardly serve to describe it. Indeed, any living organism exhibits a degree of complexity quite beyond the capacity of our libraries. This complexity has led some thinkers to suggest that living things are not the outcome of physical law but instead the creation of a (super)-intelligent designer.
In this talk, we examine the development of complexity in fluid flow. Examples include splashing water, necking of fluids, swirls in heated gases, and jets thrown up from beds of sand. We watch complexity develop in front of our eyes. Mostly, we are able to understand and explain what we are seeing. We do our work by following a succession of very specific situations. In following these specific problems, we soon get to broader issues: predictability and chaos, mechanisms for the generation of complexity and of simple laws, and finally the question of whether there is a natural tendency toward the formation of complex ''machines''
|
|
|